See www.zabbix.com for the official Zabbix site.

Docs/specs/ZBXNEXT-973

From Zabbix.org
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Recreate and maintain a new set of templates

ZBXNEXT-973

Status: Draft

Description

Current templates are buggy, outdated and don't represent Zabbix capabilities well. They should be recreated from the scratch.

Summary

Existing templates have many problems:

Specification

should item keys be as short as possible or always specify all parameters ? as in net.if.in[eth0] or net.if.in[eth0,bytes] ? the latter would get quite ugly for something like icmppingsec[127.0.0.1,3,100,56,1000,avg] ... --Richlv 14:43, 5 January 2012 (SAST)

I vote for short keys. KISS principle. --Dimir 12:04, 11 January 2012 (SAST)
agreed --Richlv 12:07, 11 January 2012 (SAST)
Naming
Shouldn't the naming scheme better be like Template_[Category]_[Object], like "Template_App_SqlServer2003" or "Template_OS_Linux"? Otherwise the list will become rather confusing with many Templates. --Maxhq 01:43, 16 March 2012 (SAST)
could be, but it also makes template names longer. alternatively, we could just make additional host groups like "Application templates" or "Templates: applications" --Richlv 12:46, 16 March 2012 (SAST)
What about TPL_ or Tpl_ instead of Template_ (it's shorter) --Maxhq 01:43, 16 March 2012 (SAST)
it is, but it's mighty cryptic as well :) --Richlv 12:46, 16 March 2012 (SAST)
use underscores or spaces ?
do we need additional groups ? --Richlv 14:49, 5 January 2012 (SAST)

Details

The section contains minimum set of templates for inclusion into 2.0:

Platforms:

Devices:

Network:

Applications and services:

Agentless:

Zabbix:

API changes

None

Database changes

None

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox